|
Jacques
Tati’s 1967 Playtime depicts an urban enclave of International-Style
architecture, ubiquitous technology, commodified encounters, and alienated
people that manages, somehow, to result in a comedic romance in which
folks learn to find their way in a city that doesn’t function as
efficiently as its planners would hope. Playtime marks the return
of the director’s hapless alter ego, M. Hulot, who stumbles through
a glass maze of overlapping and interconnected enclosures -- office spaces,
convention spaces, transportation spaces, domestic spaces, pleasure spaces
-- searching for a bureaucratic functionary, meeting an old army buddy,
and occasionally encountering Barbara, an American tourist with whom he
engages in an anonymous romance. Throughout the film Hulot appears from
time to time, sometimes portrayed by Tati, sometimes as a double. We also
witness Barbara being pulled along through various scenes on a tourist
excursion through the glass city. But neither of them can fairly be said
to be the film’s protagonists. Tati intended for them to share the
same significance as the other hundreds of characters and extras that
crowded his cinematic frame.
As such, Playtime
defies easy orientation. It is a comedy, a romance, a farce, and a social
commentary. The film also defies easy viewing. Tati shot his urban comedy
in 70-millimeter format and refused to employ close-ups to fix his audience’s
attention on particular details. Instead, the film presents a broad and
largely undifferentiated canvas in which each portion of the frame contains
humorous interactions, structural details, and site gags. Contributing
to Playtime’s disorienting tableau, Tati weaves together
a soundscape of multi-lingual dialogue and sound effects that both comments
upon the film’s imagery and confounds the audience’s efforts
to fix meaning upon a particular component of the frame. The film’s
dialogue offers some degree of narrative direction but is largely superfluous.
Like a Chaplin film, Playtime possess charms similar to those
found in a silent film, though students of aural landscapes would decry
that notion. Despite its occasionally frustrating construction, Tati’s
film offers a lighthearted lens upon modernity that, despite its initial
gloom, reveals an optimistic potential for urbanity to transform itself
into a playground. |