12.1 Weight gain and junk food (deermice.sav). An experiment randomly assigned lab mice to one of three groups. Group 1 received a standard diet, group 2 received a diet of junk food, and group 3 received a diet of health food. Weight gains (grams) after 5 weeks were:
Group 1 (standard diet): 11.8 12.0 10.7 9.1 12.1
Group 2 (junk food): 13.6 14.4 12.8 13.0 13.4
Group 3 (health food): 9.2 9.6 8.6 8.5 9.8
(A) Calculate the means and standard deviations for
each group. How do
they compare?
(B) Construct side-by-side boxplots of the data. Describe what you see.
(C) The grand mean is 11.240; N = 15. Conduct an ANOVA. Show
all hypothesis testing steps. Interpret your results.
(D) Optional: Download deermice.sav
and replicate the analyses in SPSS (Analyze > Compare Means > One-way ANOVA).
12.2 Bronchial reactivity (bronch-react.sav; source unknown). Fifteen asthmatic were studied to assess the short-term effects of exposure to irritant gases. Group 1 was exposed to sulfur dioxide, group 2 was exposed to nitrous dioxide, and group 3 was exposed to pure oxygen. The response variable is an index of bronchial reactivity. The grand mean for the bronchial reactivity scores is 10.253 (s = 8.651, N = 15). Bronchial reactivity scores for the individual participants are shown below. Explore the data with side-by-side boxplots. Then test the means for a difference with a one-way ANOVA procedure..
Group 1 (sulfur dioxide) : 20.8 5.1 30.1 24.4 13.8
Group 2 (nitrous dioxide): 7.5 11.9 3.1 4.7 10.3 2.2
Group 3 (oxygen) : 9.3 2.1 2.4 6.1
12.3 Adaptation to maternal roles (mat-role.sav; Nurcombe et al, 1984; Howell, 1995, pp. 302 - 304). This study considers adaptation to maternal roles. Group 1 women had low birth-weight infants and received training about the special needs of their infants. Group 2 women had low birth-weight infants and received no special training. Group 3 women had full-term babies and received no special training (control group). The dependent variable is a score to survey questions in which high values indicate difficulty adapting to motherhood. Here is a listing of the data set. (Data may also be downloaded in the form of mat-role.sav by right-clicking the highlighted text).
Group 1 (n =29) |
Group 2 (n = 27) |
Group 3 (n = 37) |
21 |
12 |
|
13 |
19 |
25 |
29 |
10 |
14 |
12 |
24 |
16 |
14 |
17 |
13 |
11 |
25 |
10 |
12 |
16 |
13 |
13 |
26 |
11 |
13 |
19 |
20 |
13 |
17 |
23 |
10 |
18 |
16 |
11 |
18 |
20 |
13 |
13 |
11 |
19 |
21 |
12 |
11 |
27 |
17 |
11 |
29 |
18 |
27 |
14 |
18 |
13 |
17 |
18 |
13 |
13 |
15 |
14 |
25 |
13 |
16 |
16 |
15 |
15 |
18 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
13 |
16 |
16 |
10 |
12 |
11 |
12 |
12 |
21 |
12 |
22 |
13 |
20 |
16 |
|
14 |
17 |
|
14 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
11 |
(A) Explore the data with side-by-side boxplots. Report the most salient findings from this exploration. What do you make of the outside values?
(B) Group summary statistics are shown below. Construct a one-way ANOVA table based on these summary statistics. Report the F statistic and P-value used to test H0: �1 = �2 = �3.
(C) In rejecting H0, are you concluding that all three
groups differ?
12.4 Fever reduction. Data on the effect of three fever-reducers are summarized in the table below. All patients were seen in the emergency room with a diagnosis of flu and all had a fever of 100.0oF to 100.9oF. Drugs were assigned randomly. Patients were telephoned 4 hours after administration of the drug to determine how much fever was subsequently reduced. Conduct an ANOVA. Interpret your results. (Rosner, 2000, p. 569.)
DRUG n MEAN REDUCTION STD. DEV
Aspirin 5 1.50 0.61
Asp+ Acet. 5 0.36 0.58
Acetaminophen 5 0.08 0.77
OVERALL 15 0.65
12.5 Sense of coherence (soc.sav; data are fictitious). Antonovsky (1985) proposed that a personal characteristic called "sense of coherence" (an amalgamation of a world view that see life as coherent, meaningful, and manageable, is hypothesized to be a determinant of health in coping with stress) fosters healthy living. Let us consider a fictitious survey that measured sense of coherence (SOC) in three groups. Group 1 is composed of concentration camp survivors, group 2 is composed of prison guards, and group 3 is composed of a random sample the population. Data are:
Group 1 (survivors): 131 167 113 134 178
Group 2 (guards) : 105 52 71 56 85
Group 3 (controls) : 136 108 103
75 113
(A) Explore the data with side-by-side boxplots.
(B) Calculate the mean and standard deviation of
each group.
(C) Test the means for a difference with a one-way ANOVA procedure. Show all
hypothesis testing steps. Discuss the relevance of your finding..
12.6 Maternal smoking 1. Birth weights of infants (lbs.) in four groups are shown below (smoking-moms.sav; Rosner, 2000, p. 569). Group 1 mothers are nonsmokers. Group 2 are ex-smokers, Group 3 smoked approx. half-pack per day, and Group 4 smoked approx. one pack per day.
Group 1 (non-smokers): 7.5 6.2 6.9 7.4 9.2 8.3
Group 2 (ex-smokers) : 5.8 7.3 8.2 7.1 7.8
Group 3 (half-pack) : 5.9 6.2 5.8 4.7 8.3 6.2
Group 4 (full-pack) : 6.2 6.8 5.7 4.9 6.2 7.1 5.8 5.4
(A) Explore the data with a side-by-side boxplot.
(B) Conduct an ANOVA and...
(C) ...discuss your findings.
12.7 Maternal smoking 2. The variables and design of this study are similar to the study described in the prior exercise (exercise 12.6). Data have been changed and are stored in smok_bw.sav. Compare the groups with appropriate exploratory and inferential methods. Discuss your findings.
Key to Odd Numbered Exercises Key to Even Numbered Exercises (may not be posted)