applet-magic.com
Thayer Watkins
Silicon Valley
& Tornado Alley
USA

A Demonstration that the Gross Benefit of an Increase in Consumption is the Area Under the Demand Curve for that Range of Consumption

The analysis will be first for a single household and the extension to the entire market is merely a matter of aggregating over all households in the market.

Let the utility function of a household be U(x,Y) where x is the level of consumption of the good under consideration and Y is the vector of the levels of consumption of all other goods and services. When a household maximizes utility subject to an income constraint pxx + PY·Y = M they consume where


∂U/∂x = λpx
 

The Lagrangian multiplier λ is such that dU/dM=λ. (The first order conditions for the other goods and services are not relevant here.)

For an increase in consumption of dx the increase in utility is given by:


dU = (∂U/∂x)dx = λpxdx
 

But dU=(dU/dM)dM = λdM so the amount of money income necessary to achieve the same increase in utility satisfaction as an increase in consumption of dx is given by:


dU = λpxdx = λdM
and thus
dM = pxdx
 

The increase in income ΔM necessary to achieve the same increase in satisfaction as an increase in consumption from X to X+ΔX is given by the integral of the above relation over the range of x from X to X+ΔX; i.e.,


ΔM = ∫XS+ΔXpxdx.
 

The demand function for a household is the relationship between the quantity x consumed as a function of its price with all other factors held fixed; i.e,,


X = f(px)
and the inverse demand function is
px = f-1(X)
 

Thus the previous integral expression is just the area under the demand function with price being expressed as a function of consumption.

The sum of the equivalent money incomes for all consumers as a result of the sum of their increases in consumption is then the area under the aggregate market demand curve.

HOME PAGE OF applet-magic
HOME PAGE OF Thayer Watkins
1