San José State University
Department of Economics |
---|
applet-magic.com Thayer Watkins Silicon Valley & Tornado Alley USA |
---|
|
The Market Line and the Effect of Leverage
The expected rate of return on equity, requity, and the beta risk on equity, βequity, both satisfy from their definitions the same sort of equation; i.e.,
where L is the debt/equity ratio.
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) says that the expected rate of return and risk for the common stock should fall on the Market Line:
where rf is the riskfree interest rate and rm is the expected
rate of return on the market portfolio.
Suppose the expected rate of return and risk fall on the Market
Line for an unleveraged firm; i.e., L=0. It is shown below that
under some standard
assumptions, the expected rate of return and risk
will fall on the market line for any leverage ratio.
If the unleveraged firm return and risk fall on the market line
this means that
(1)
Now let us consider whether the return and risk for a leverage ratio L will satisfy the equation of the market line. (2)
If we subtract equation (1) from equation (2) we are left with
We can divide through by L to get
This can be rewritten as
Now, if rdebt = rf and βdebt=0 then this equation is just equation (1),
This is just the equation of the Market Line. thus the expected rate of return and risk will fall on the Market Line for any leverage ratio L.
Let t be the tax rate on corporate profits. Let Y be the
earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT). Without leverage,
The required rate of return on equity is then
Without debt the income to equity holders is Y(1-t) so the value of the company is
With a leverage ratio of L and riskfree debt (βdebt=0)
so the required rate of return on equity is
The income after interest (taxable profits) is
The debt share of total capital D/(D+E) is equal to L/(L+1). Therefore debt is equal to (L/(L+1)) times total capital, but total capital is the same as VU. Thus,
After taxes the income to equity holder is
and the valuation of the company is
When the assumption of rdebt = rf and the relations for D and VU are substituted into this expression one gets:
It is convenient to express Y(1-t) as VU(rf + βassets(rm - rf)) so
For convenience now βassets is expressed as βa. Thus,
The value of the company is then
Example: Let L=3, t=0.4, rf=0.05, rm-rf=0.08, andβa=0.8.
Then
Effect of Leverage on the Valuation of Shares
The effect of leverage on the valuation of shares can also be determined from the above analysis. Let N be the number of share in the unlevered corporation. Then the price per share, pU is given by:
In achieving a leverage ratio of L, the equity share of capital is reduced from 1 to 1/(L+1) so the number of shares is reduced from N to N/(L+1)). The price per share for the leveraged firm is then
This reduces to
For example let L=10, t=0.4, rf=0.05, rm=0.09 and βa=0.5.
Then
Thus if PU = $50 then PL = $87.
HOME PAGE OF Thayer Watkins |