Source:
A traveller, once, in Indiana, on setting out early one morning from the
place where he had passed the night, consulted his map of the country, and
finding that a very considerable town called . . . Vienna . . . occupied a
point on his road but some twelve or fifteen miles off, concluded to journey
as far as that place before breakfast. Another equally extensive town ...
was laid down at a convenient distance for his afternoon stage; and there
he proposed halting for the night. He continued to travel at a good round
pace until the sun had attained a great height in heaven, and until he
computed that he had accomplished more than twice or thrice the distance
which he proposed to himself in the outset.... Still he saw no town before
him, even of the humblest kind, much less such a magnificent one as his map
had prepared him to look for. At length, meeting a solitary wood-chopper
emerging from the forest, he accosted him, and inquired how far it was to
Vienna. "Vienna!" exclaimed the man, "why you passed itfive and twenty miles back: did you not notice a stick of hewn timber and
a blazed tree beside the road? That was Vienna." The dismayed traveller then
inquired how far it was to the other place, at which he designed passing t
he night. "Why you are right on that place now," returned the man; "it begins
just the other side of yon ravine, and runs down
to a clump of girdled trees which you will see about a mile further on the
road." "And are there no houses built?" faltered out the traveller, who
began to suspect that, as the song says-"The heath this night must be his
bed."
"Oh, no houses whatsomever," returned the woodman; "they hewed and hauled
the logs for a blacksmith's shop, but before they raised it the town lots
were all disposed of in the eastern states, and every thing has been left
just as you now see it ever since."
It is pretty much in the same way that things are left, at the present time,
in this portion of the country. If any one should make a map of the lands
lying within the compass of some thirty or forty miles from this city, and
embrace in it all the improvements, projected as well as actually existing,
the spectator, who does not know the true condition of the country, would be
astonished at the appearance of dense population which it would present.
Cities, towns and villages would be represented as lying scattered around
him at every step. The intermediate slips of unoccupied ground would seem
hardly large enough even to furnish pasture for the stray cattle of the
surrounding towns, much less to supply their inhabitants with all the
necessary products of agricultural consumption. We hear no more, now-a-days,
of a farm being sold, as a farm, in the vicinity of the city. The land is
all divided into lots of a hundred feet by twenty-five; and it would seem as
if, in the visions of speculators, a dense city must soon extend from the
Atlantic ocean to the lakes, and from the Hudson river to the borders of
Connecticut.
Source:
William Leggett,
A Collection of the Political Writings of William Leggett,
New York: Taylor and Dodd, (ed.)Theodore Sedgwick, Jr., Volume 2, pp. 83-85. Appeared on September 14, 1836.
in the New York Evening
Post.
Land Speculation in Chicago 1836
Harriet Martineau,
Society in America,
Volume 1, New York: Saunders and Otley, 1837, pp. 259- 261.
Source:
Joseph Baldwin, The Flush Times of Alabama and Mississippi,
New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1853, pp. 82-87.
This country was just settling up. Marvellous accounts had gone forth of the fertility of its virgin lands; and the productions of the soil were commanding a price remunerating to slave labor as it had never been r emunerated before. Emigrants came flocking in from all quarters of the Union, especially from the slaveholding States. The new country seemed to be a reservoir, and every road leading to it a vagrant stream of enterprise and adventure. Money, or what passed for money, was the only cheap thing to be had. Every cross-road and every avocation presented an opening, -through which a fortune was seen by the adventurer in near perspective. Credit was a thing of course. To refuse it-if the thing was ever donewere an insult for which a bowie knife were not a too summary or exemplary a means of redress. The State banks were issuing their bills by the sheet . . . ; and no other showing was asked of the applicant for the loan than an authentication of his great distress for money. Finance, even in its most exclusive quarter, had thus already got, in this wonderful revolution, to work upon the principles of the charity hospital. If an overseer grew tired of supervising a plantation and felt a call to the mercantile life, even if he omitted the compendious method of buying out a merchant wholesale, stock, house and good will, and laying down, at once, his bullwhip for the yard-stick-all he had to do was to go on to New-York, and present himself in Pearl-street with a letter avouching his citizenship, and a clean shirt, and he was regularly given a through ticket to speedy bankruptcy.
Under this stimulating process prices rose like smoke. Lots in obscure villages were held at city prices; lands, bought at the minimum cost of government, were sold at from thirty to forty dollars per acre, and considered dirt cheap at that. In short, the country had got to be a full antetype of California, in all except the gold. . . .
"Commerce was king"-and Rags, Tag and Bobtail his cabinet council. Rags was treasurer. Banks, chartered on a specie basis, did a very flourishing business on the promissory notes of the individual stockholders ingeniously substituted in lieu of cash. They issued ton for one, the one being fictitious. They generously loaned all the directors could not use themselves, and were not choice whether Bardolph was the endorser for Falstaff, or Falstaff borrowed on his own proper credit, or the funds advanced him by Shallow. The stampede towards the golden temple became general: the delusion prevailed far and wide that this thing was not a burlesque on commerce and finance. Even the directors of the banks began to have their doubts whether the intended swindle was not a failure. Like Lord Clive, when reproached for extortion to the extent of some millions in Bengal, they exclaimed, after the bubble burst, "When they thought of what they had got, and what they might have got, they were astounded at their own moderation."